Creating, Viewing, and Healing Through Expression
Art has been central to human culture for tens of thousands of years. From cave paintings to contemporary digital media, humans have used art to express identity, emotions, and meaning. But what happens in the brain when we create or view art? How does art produce change—and can it be healing?
The Brain on Art: What Happens When We Create
Creating art activates multiple areas of the brain simultaneously. The prefrontal cortex engages in decision-making and planning, while the motor cortex directs the physical act of drawing, painting, or sculpting. Meanwhile, the limbic system—the emotional center of the brain—lights up in response to color, texture, and personal meaning (Bolwerk et al., 2014).
One theory suggests that the mechanism of change in art-making may not be any single factor but the interplay of movement, reflection, and repetition. The rhythm of brushstrokes, the meditative act of shaping clay, or the revisiting of symbolic themes may help regulate the nervous system. Neuroscientists note that these repetitive, embodied processes often activate the brain’s reward pathways, releasing dopamine and serotonin, which are linked to motivation and well-being (Kaimal et al., 2016).
How Viewers Interpret Art
When we view art, the brain does far more than record visual information. Instead, perception becomes an embodied, emotional, and cognitive experience. Neuroscience research shows that the mirror neuron system activates in response to artistic gestures—brushstrokes, movement, or implied motion—allowing us to “simulate” the artist’s actions and emotions in our own neural circuitry (Freedberg & Gallese, 2007). This embodied simulation explains why a swirling Van Gogh sky can feel turbulent, or why a simple line drawing may still carry emotional weight.
Yet, the experience of art is not purely neurological—it is also interpretive. Viewers do not passively receive meaning; they actively construct it. The brain engages in a layered process of perception and interpretation:
Formal cues such as composition, balance, color, and texture guide our immediate emotional responses.
Symbolism and metaphor activate associative networks, allowing us to connect the image to larger narratives or archetypes.
Personal memory shapes meaning, as we map our own life experiences onto the visual field.
Cultural context influences how we interpret images—what seems sacred in one culture may appear mundane in another.
In this sense, art functions as a dialogue between creator and viewer. The artist encodes emotion, narrative, or gesture into the work, but its interpretation unfolds uniquely in the mind of the observer. This process is often described in aesthetic philosophy as the “hermeneutic circle”—a continual negotiation between the work, the viewer’s prior knowledge, and new insights sparked by the encounter (Gadamer, 1975/2004).
What makes this exchange profound is that it does not require exact alignment with the artist’s original intent. Instead, meaning emerges in the space between expression and interpretation. An abstract painting may never reveal what the artist was “trying to say,” but it can evoke sensations, insights, or even healing reflections in the viewer. This interpretive openness is part of art’s enduring power: it allows multiple truths to coexist, each shaped by individual perception.
Ultimately, to view art is to engage in a co-creative act. Our brains respond not only to what is on the canvas but also to the invisible layers of memory, culture, and imagination that we bring to the encounter. Through this process, art remains alive—reshaped and reinterpreted each time it is seen.
Is Art Healing? Mechanisms of Change
Art therapy research consistently demonstrates that engaging in creative expression can reduce anxiety, lower cortisol (the stress hormone), and improve mood regulation (Sandmire et al., 2012). Neuroimaging studies further suggest that making art strengthens connections between the brain’s default mode network (associated with self-reflection) and regions responsible for emotional regulation and sensory integration (Bolwerk et al., 2014). Yet despite this growing body of evidence, the precise mechanism of change remains an area of active exploration.
Several overlapping processes are thought to contribute to art’s healing potential:
Embodied Movement: The kinesthetic act of creating—whether through brushstrokes, sculpting, or collage—provides a nonverbal channel for emotional processing. Movement helps bypass the limitations of language and taps into somatic memory, echoing trauma research that emphasizes the role of the body in storing and releasing emotional experience (van der Kolk, 2014).
Symbolic Reflection: Art externalizes inner experiences into visible form, giving individuals the distance needed to view, name, and manage emotions. By turning abstract feelings into tangible images, the overwhelming becomes approachable. This reflective process is central to psychodynamic art therapy, where symbolic imagery allows unconscious material to surface in safe, contained ways (Malchiodi, 2012).
Repetition and Flow: Rhythmic, patterned creative processes—such as shading, weaving, or layering—can induce a state of flow, similar to mindfulness meditation (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). This state supports nervous system regulation by reducing hyperarousal and facilitating parasympathetic activation, thereby lowering stress responses.
Narrative Integration: Symbolic self-portraits, life maps, or recurring visual metaphors help people organize fragmented experiences into coherent narratives. By constructing visual stories, individuals reshape identity and reclaim agency. This narrative process aligns with broader therapeutic theories that link healing to meaning-making and narrative coherence (White & Epston, 1990).
Taken together, these processes highlight how art-making engages both top-down (cognitive reflection, narrative construction) and bottom-up (sensory, kinesthetic, affective) pathways. Unlike talk therapy alone, art therapy integrates these dimensions simultaneously, producing what some scholars describe as an embodied integration of mind and body (Hinz, 2020).
Though we cannot yet pinpoint a single “active ingredient,” the consensus is that the synergy of processes—movement, reflection, repetition, and symbolic meaning-making—creates a multidimensional pathway for change. In this way, art operates less like a pill with one active compound and more like a rich ecosystem of healing forces that interact dynamically with each participant’s needs and context.
Art Beyond Therapy: Everyday Benefits for Mind and Body
Art is not limited to clinical contexts—it offers measurable benefits to anyone who engages with it. Whether through painting, writing, dancing, or simply appreciating a piece of music or sculpture, the act of engaging with art supports health and well-being across the lifespan.
Research demonstrates that both creating and viewing art are associated with a range of positive outcomes:
Reduced stress and anxiety: Engaging in creative expression can decrease physiological stress markers, including lowered cortisol levels and heart rate variability improvements (Kaimal et al., 2016). Viewing art in museums or healthcare settings has similarly been shown to calm the nervous system and promote relaxation (Clow & Fredhoi, 2006).
Improved cognitive flexibility and memory: Participation in artistic activities has been linked to enhanced neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to form new connections. This is particularly important for aging populations, where art-making can help preserve memory and cognitive function (Noice & Noice, 2006).
Increased resilience and emotional regulation: Artistic practices support resilience by fostering self-expression, meaning-making, and emotional balance. When individuals externalize inner experiences through imagery, they build coping strategies that can be drawn upon during times of stress (Stuckey & Nobel, 2010).
Enhanced social connection and empathy: Participating in group art-making or attending cultural events creates shared meaning and strengthens bonds. Neuroscientific studies suggest that viewing expressive gestures in art activates mirror neurons, enhancing empathy and perspective-taking (Freedberg & Gallese, 2007).
Importantly, these benefits do not require advanced skill or long-term commitment. Short creative sessions—such as coloring in a mandala, keeping a visual journal, free writing, or engaging in improvisational music—have been linked to immediate improvements in mood, stress regulation, and even immune system markers (Reynolds et al., 2008). The accessibility of creative practice means that art can serve as a form of everyday self-care, much like exercise or mindfulness meditation.
In fact, public health researchers now argue that integrating art into daily routines—whether through community workshops, accessible museum programs, or at-home creative practices—could play a significant role in preventive health strategies (Fancourt & Finn, 2019). By cultivating creativity as part of everyday life, individuals not only enhance personal well-being but also contribute to healthier, more connected communities.
Art engages the brain in profound ways—bridging movement, thought, and feeling. While the precise mechanisms of transformation remain complex, evidence points to art’s unique ability to regulate emotions, foster meaning-making, and support healing. Whether through creation or appreciation, engaging with art offers not only personal enrichment but also measurable mental health benefits.
References
Bolwerk, A., Mack-Andrick, J., Lang, F. R., Dörfler, A., & Maihöfner, C. (2014). How art changes your brain: Differential effects of visual art production and cognitive art evaluation on functional brain connectivity. PLOS ONE, 9(7), e101035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101035
Clow, A., & Fredhoi, C. (2006). Normalisation of salivary cortisol levels and self‐report stress by a brief lunchtime visit to an art gallery by London City workers. Journal of Holistic Healthcare, 3(2), 29–32.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Fancourt, D., & Finn, S. (2019). What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1975)
Hinz, L. D. (2020). Expressive therapies continuum: A framework for using art in therapy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kaimal, G., Ray, K., & Muniz, J. (2016). Reduction of cortisol levels and participants’ responses following art making. Art Therapy, 33(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2016.1166832
Malchiodi, C. A. (2012). Handbook of art therapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Noice, H., & Noice, T. (2006). Artistic performance: Acting, ballet, and contemporary dance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 489–503). Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds, F., Nabors, N., & Quinlan, R. (2008). The benefits of creative activity for mental health and well-being: A literature review. Arts in Psychotherapy, 35(5), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2008.06.002
Sandmire, D. A., Gorham, S. R., Rankin, N. E., & Grimm, D. R. (2012). The influence of art making on anxiety: A pilot study. Art Therapy, 29(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2012.683748
Stuckey, H. L., & Nobel, J. (2010). The connection between art, healing, and public health: A review of current literature. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156497
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. W. W. Norton.
